The mismatch: Discovering Metamask’s wallet failure to show the right balance of Weth
In a recent blog post, users began to notice an inconsistency on the screens of Metamask’s wallets of Token Weth’s balance. 0XC778417E063141139FCE0982780140AA0CD5AB in execution
The Code: A look at Metamk’s internal logic
After a closer inspection of the code responsible for the management of the token contract provided to MetamSk is correct, but the resulting balance shown in the wallet does not match.
Code and identified, we are more anomalies, we analyze in essence, the problem with the way in which the wallet interacts with the internal state of the Token contract.
The problem: contractual interactions of misaligned Token
Token’s contract after the successful execution of the transaction contains and the crucial information that is being misunderstood in Metamask. Specifically
However, Timestam does not constantly refer to all customers, including those connected to Metamask. Token’s contract is internal, does it out of sequence with the local wallet watch, which leads to an inaccurate representation of the balance.
The resulting contest
This discrepancy in Weth Balance shows several conceived:
- Incorrect screen :
.
Mitigate the problem
To solve update balance and ensure that the synchronization of the time brand is implemented in all customer applications.
Conclusion
The mismatch between the Wethal shown in Metamask’s wallets and its real value in the chain highlights a critical defect in the internal logic of the wallet. The root cause of this problem,